With countless millions of web pages, files, and programs on the Internet today, there are certainly some priceless gems to be found.  However, there is more than a fair share of rhinestones mixed in, that is flashy web pages that look great until you actually read their content to find out that they really offer very little useful information.  Beyond that, there are just as many plain old rocks, resources that are as common as gravel and just about as valuable.

So how can you tell if a technology resource is worthy to be called a "treasure" and added to our collection?  While there is no definitive test, there are certainly some guidelines to consider when examining your finds under the microscope.
 

Is it aligned to standards?
Is it attractive?
Is it informative?
Does it do something better than could be done without technology?


Is it aligned to standards?
This HAS to be the first question you ask yourself.  Not "How cool is the site?"  Not "How well written is this lesson?"  Not "How much will my kids like this project?"

The question is "Does this resource help my students learn the information that the course of study says they are supposed to learn from me this year?"

Sure, there are a lot of great technology resources out there, but that doesn't mean you can actually use all of them.  The problem develops when we come across something exciting and then try to figure out how to fit it into our curriculum.  Many times when we do that we can end up spending time in class that does not address what the students are really supposed to be learning.  Instead of truly integrating technology into our curriculum, we take a detour from the lesson to "have some fun" with the computers.  It shouldn't be this way.

Instead the curriculum needs to drive the technology use.  The beauty of the Treasure Chest is you can't add a resource without tying it to an indicator in the Ohio Academic Content Standards.  We need to pick resources that directly support what our kids are supposed to learn.

Bottom Line: If the resource doesn't help your students meet an objective in your course of study, is it really worth spending precious time on?

Back to the top



Is it attractive?

Web pages are different than any other form of media, and they should take advantage of that.  There is no excuse for a web page to be simply black text on a white background.  On the other hand, whatever design elements are used should not be distracting, but contribute to the content and purpose of the site.  Here is a list of some good features that can enhance tech resources when used properly:

Bottom Line: The look of a technology resource should inspire the user to learn and return.

Back to the top



Is it informative?

Of course it is not enough for a resource to simply look attractive.  It must also provide useful information that is appropriate to the level and need of the user.  Here are some good points to look for in any technology resource:

Bottom Line: A tech resource needs to connect the user with useful, relevant information.

Back to the top



Does it do something better than could be done without technology?

Let's face it, technology costs money.  Computers, software, training time, network wiring, and repairs all consume resources.  To be justified, technology needs to earn its keep.  It needs to offer something that can not be found otherwise.  What can a technology resource offer that is "better" than a book, a handout, physical manipulatives, and such?

Bottom Line: If you can do the same thing, with the same quality results, without a particular technology resource ... then that resource is not so valuable.

Back to the top